MATH464
Lecture 1
Proposition:
Let . Then .
Proof:
By and angle sum identities, as desired.
Corollary:
(Induction on the number of factors: the base case is the Proposition, and the inductive step applies the Proposition to .) Taking every ,
Note:
One can derive the exponential representations of and : Adding the two kills the term, subtracting them kills the term:
Lecture 2
Periodic functions.
Definition:
We say a function is periodic of period if
Fact: If is periodic of period 1, then can be “represented” as
Note that not all infinite sums of exponentiations are convergent, but in most cases that we will encounter in this class, this is an exact representation.
The collection of functions can be used to represent any function of period 1.
Now suppose is of period 1, and we are told
How can we compute ?
Examine . Antidifferentiating, we see that this must be split into two cases: and . (The numerator vanishes because for integer .) So every term of the sum dies except :
Thus, if is of period 1, then
Now suppose is of period . Let . Then is of period 1. We can observe this fact
We already know how to represent :
Let . We can change variables to obtain:
The same substitution in the coefficient formula (, so , and becomes ):
Useful result:
If (-times differentiable), then decays like .
Why: integrate by parts once. The boundary term cancels because and are both -periodic, so Iterating times gives , and is bounded, so .
Example:
Suppose is periodic of period and even.
The last step shifts the interval over to , which is legal by the Proposition below.
Proposition:
If is periodic of period , then
Proof:
Let . In particular , which is the claim.
Example:
Consider the square wave of period 1 defined on by
One can easily find the Fourier coefficients by using casework on the integral between 0 and 1, as this is a piecewise function. Doing it: For , with antiderivative , using and . This is the series quoted in Lecture 4.
Lecture 3
Suppose is periodic of period .
When is even and real-valued then , or that are real.
Example:
The triangle wave is the following. Let be a periodic function with period 1
Find the Fourier series of .
For : split . Since is even, is odd and integrates to , while is even, so the integral is twice the half-range one: Integrate by parts with , , so and . The boundary term dies at both ends ( at , at ):
Thus, the Fourier series of is
However, since odd numbers come in pairs, we can write pairing with and using , then substituting .
Rayleigh’s identity (Parseval’s Theorem)
Let be periodic of period with Fourier series
Assume has only a finite number of jump discontinuities on the interval . Then
Proof:
Integrate over one period. By the same two-case computation as in Lecture 2, equals when and otherwise, so only the diagonal survives: Divide by and use .
Lecture 4
Example:
Refer back to the square wave diagram. We know that the Fourier series is
Using Parseval’s theorem, and noting everywhere so the left side is just 1: (The 8 is 4 from , doubled because and contribute equally.)
Example:
Refer back to the triangle wave. We know that The left-hand side of Parseval is, using evenness, so Here , and the pairing again supplies the factor of 2.
Theorem: (Pointwise convergence of Fourier series)
Let be a periodic function of period . Suppose and are continuous on except for a finite number of jump discontinuities. Then the Fourier series converges to at every number . That is,
Example:
Return to the square wave series. Pairing with and using ,
At , we have . The Fourier series returns the same result—since .
At , we get . In the Fourier series:
Hence, we get a nice sum from an alternating series:
Example:
Let’s return to the triangle wave again. At , we get . Test in the Fourier series:
Do the same thing at . The periodic extension is continuous there with , and for odd , so
This sum runs over all odd , so it is twice the sum over : the same result as before.
Toward the trigonometric Fourier series.
Motivation:
Suppose is periodic of period . Then
Lecture 5
Trigonometric Fourier Series
Let be periodic of period . For example, we could have .
Then can be represented as
Now, how do we compute , the coefficients?
Recall:
Trig identities: , . From these, we can derive identities for . Writing down the versions too and adding/subtracting:
Return to
Let . Multiply by and integrate over (swapping and is fine here, since the series converges uniformly under our assumptions):
We know that The first piece vanishes since is a nonzero integer, leaving
Now, return to the sum from before. Only the single term survives:
So we have filled in one nasty sum/integral pair, let’s look at the last one: Since is even, the evaluations at and agree and the first piece is 0:
Shortcut: that whole computation was unnecessary. is odd in (odd times even), and we integrate over the symmetric interval , so it is 0 immediately.
Now, combine all the sums to obtain
Now look for . Integrate itself over : The first integral is ; the integrals vanish as computed above; the integrals vanish since is odd. So This is exactly the case of the formula for , which is why the constant term of is written and not : it lets one formula cover every .
Using the same methods, we can find : multiply by instead. We need one more orthogonality relation, by the identical case analysis. The terms vanish by the oddness shortcut, and kills the term, so
Example:
Let be periodic of period , and
what is the Fourier series of ?
Solution: here , so and every is just . For , integrate by parts with , , : For , take , , : Assembling, with constant term :
Lecture 6
Relation between complex and trigonometric coefficients
Let be periodic of period . Since , for
Parseval’s Theorem (trigonometric form):
If is real-valued, then , so
Example:
Return to the example from Lecture 5:
At , is continuous and :
Using Parseval’s theorem, with and (Lecture 4):
Lecture 7
Theorem:
Any function can be expressed as the sum of an odd and even function.
Proof:
The first term is even and the second is odd: replacing by leaves the first unchanged and flips the sign of the second.
Theorem:
Suppose is a periodic function of period with Fourier series If is an even function, for all , and if is an odd function, for all .
Proof:
If is odd, then is odd (odd times even), so its integral over the symmetric interval is 0, and for all (including ). If is even, then is odd (even times odd), so for all .
Fact:
Let be defined on .
(1) Even periodic extension of , . Extend as an even function on , and extend this to a periodic function of period . Call this . Since is even, its Fourier series has only cosine terms: The last step uses that is even and on .
This is the Fourier cosine series of .
(2) Odd periodic extension of , . Extend as an odd function on , then extend as a periodic function of period . Call this . Since is odd, its Fourier series has only sine terms: since is even (odd times odd).
This is the Fourier sine series of .
Example:
Let on . Find the cosine and sine series of .
Solution: here . For , integrate by parts with , , : With constant term , Similarly, with , , :
Fourier series of derivatives.
Suppose is a continuous periodic function of period such that is piecewise continuous (finitely many jump discontinuities per period). Write We want to relate to . Examine : by periodicity. Now let and integrate by parts: The boundary term vanishes because and . (If has jumps, integrate by parts on each piece; since itself is continuous, the interior boundary terms cancel.)
Conclude (the case included):
Notation:
We say if has continuous derivatives.
Consequence:
Suppose (more generally: continuous and piecewise continuous). Applying the formula to and then to , In general, .
Lecture 8
Decay of Fourier Coefficients and Differentiability
Suppose is periodic of period and piecewise continuous, with Parseval’s Theorem says and similarly (Lecture 6) and . The terms of a convergent series tend to 0, so Then an interesting question is: at what rate do the Fourier coefficients decay to 0?
Fact:
The more derivatives has, the faster the coefficients decay.
Let
Theorem 1:
Let be periodic with . Then there is such that , , for all .
Proof:
(For the record, .) For any , Lecture 7 gives On the other hand, since , Therefore Let’s do the same thing for the trigonometric coefficients. Integrating by parts (the boundary term vanishes by periodicity), and in the same way (now the boundary term is ) : Moreover and likewise . Hence Take .
Theorem 2:
Let be periodic with . Then there is such that
Proof:
Say . Then , and applying Lecture 7 twice, Exactly as before, Therefore, For general the same argument works (formally, induction on ): and . The bounds on and follow the same way by applying the boxed relations above times.
Remark:
The practical upshot: the smoother is, the fewer Fourier modes are needed to approximate it well. Lecture 9 makes this quantitative: to guarantee accuracy , the bound there needs terms, while the bound needs only .
Lecture 9
Application:
where is the -th partial sum, and is the -th error term.
Example:
Suppose is a periodic function with , and . How large must be to guarantee for all ?
Solution:
Since , and the terms and obey the same bound, Compare the sum with an integral: is decreasing, so , and Thus it suffices that , i.e. .
Example:
Now suppose is periodic with , and . Now how large must be to guarantee ?
Solution:
The same estimate gives We need , i.e. . Since ,
Note:
What about the converse? That is, suppose is periodic and the Fourier coefficients satisfy . Is ?
The answer is NO (see the example below). But it is at least partially true.
Theorem (partial converse):
Let be periodic and piecewise continuous. If for all , where , then (after redefining at its finitely many jump points, if it has any).
Proof sketch:
For , differentiate the Fourier series term by term times. The resulting terms satisfy and . By the Weierstrass M-test all of these series converge uniformly, so is (a series whose differentiated series converge uniformly may be differentiated term by term). Integrating term by term, has the same Fourier coefficients as , so has all coefficients 0, and Parseval gives . Hence at every point where is continuous.
Example:
Recall the triangle wave, with for odd and for even. Then , but the triangle wave has corners, so it is not in , let alone . So the converse fails.
The theorem only gives what is true: (, ), so the triangle wave is continuous. To conclude we would need with , which is not allowed. So the condition is required.
Heat Equation
Consider a uniform rod of length (with unit cross-sectional area). Let be the temperature of the rod at point at time . Assume the rod is insulated along its sides, and that its temperature at time is . Let be the specific heat and the density of the rod. Then to raise the temperature of a piece of length by degrees, we need units of heat energy.
Take a small piece of the rod, . Its temperature at time is approximately , and at a later time approximately . So the change in heat energy of the piece from time to is This is caused by heat conduction. Experimentally (Fourier’s law), the amount of heat flowing past a point in the positive direction per unit time (the flux) is proportional to : The proportionality constant is called the thermal conductivity of the object.
The net amount of heat flowing into the piece from time to is Equating the two, Divide by and let : the left side becomes and the right side becomes , so
Since , write , called the thermal diffusivity. This equation is also called the Diffusion Equation.
It remains to solve the PDE to obtain , the temperature of the rod:
Here is what we need:
The initial temperature of the rod: , .
Assume the endpoints of the rod and are maintained at temperature 0, that is, and .
So we must solve the initial boundary value problem
Find solutions of the PDE of the form (method of separation of variables).
If is a solution, then Observe that the left side does not depend on , and the right side does not depend on . Therefore both sides equal some constant : Now, we have two ODEs! Their solutions are:
Case 1: . Then , .
Case 2: . Then , . Here may be complex, and we allow complex constants .
Since the PDE is linear, any linear combination of such solutions is again a solution.
However, we need to satisfy the boundary conditions, i.e. we need and also . We can satisfy these by requiring and .
Case 1: . , and then forces . So , and we only get the trivial solution , which is useless.
Case 2: . Now use the other boundary condition. For a nonzero solution we need , so so and . In particular must be negative. Since and give the same , take .
Write it out: Now that we have an expression for , we obtain So for each , a solution of the PDE and the boundary conditions is Take any linear combination: We want to choose such that when , This is exactly the Fourier sine series of from Lecture 7: any piecewise continuous on can be extended to an odd periodic function of period , which expands in sines. So take Then the solution of the problem is where the are determined by the initial condition:
Equilibrium Temperature of the Rod
Since the two ends of the rod are maintained at temperature 0, physically we expect the rod’s equilibrium state to be The formula confirms this. Each , and , so with , Every mode decays, and the slowest one () decays like .
Lecture 10
Example:
Solve:
We convert this to a problem where the boundary conditions are 0. So what is the equilibrium temperature ? It does not depend on , so and the PDE becomes : is linear. Matching the boundary conditions , gives , which satisfies both the PDE and the boundary conditions.
Now suppose is the solution, and let which satisfies This is a problem with zero boundary conditions, which we know how to solve (, ): With (so and , ), integrating by parts once and twice gives so
Finally, conclude As , , the equilibrium.
Neumann Boundary Conditions
Now, suppose we know that both ends of the rod are perfectly insulated (no heat flux through the ends):
Let’s use the same process of separation of variables.
Lecture 11
Neumann Boundary Conditions (Continued)
Again seek , which leads to with solutions
Case 1: . , .
Case 2: . , .
Check the boundary conditions: should satisfy and . Requiring and works as the simplest choice.
Case 1: . Unlike the Dirichlet problem, now gives a nontrivial solution.
Case 2: . For a nonzero solution , so, exactly as for the Dirichlet problem, Also, . Together with the constant solution from Case 1, superposition gives What remains is the initial condition. To get on , we need to choose the such that which is the Fourier cosine series of (Lecture 7). So choose and the solution is
Since the rod is completely insulated, no heat escapes, and we expect the equilibrium temperature of the rod to be the constant average of the initial temperature. Indeed, every term decays, leaving
The Wave Equation
We would like to solve a system governed by Now we need two initial conditions (initial position and initial velocity), since the equation is second order in time.
Once again, use the method of separation of variables: seek solutions of the PDE and BC of the form . Then , so Consider . Then and if and . This is exactly the boundary value problem for we solved for the heat equation, so Then , so , and We want . This is the sine series of , so Also, differentiating term by term in , so is the -th sine coefficient of : Thus both families of constants are determined by the initial conditions, and the solution is complete.
Lecture 12
The Fourier Transform
Motivation:
Suppose is nonperiodic. We approximate by periodic functions as follows.
Let , and let be the periodic function of period that agrees with on . Then for each , and Let , and . Then Heuristically, as the inner integral becomes an integral over all of : This looks like a Riemann sum, with mesh , so it should converge to Call the inner integral . Then the heuristic says , which is the inversion formula (Lecture 13, proved in Lecture 15).
Definition:
The Fourier transform of is if the integral is defined.
Definition:
Let . We say ( is “absolutely integrable”) if If the limit exists, then we define
Remark:
Suppose . Then Since , : the tails of an function are small.
Example:
Let be bounded, say , and assume there are such that for . Then .
Proof:
On the middle piece, . On the tails, So for every . This is increasing in and bounded above by a finite value, so the limit exists.
Example:
Let be bounded (e.g. continuous) on , say there, and when . Then , since for every .
Example:
Recall the Taylor series of . In particular, for , , so for . Let and Then and for , so by the first example (with ). (Directly: .)
Example:
. By the same technique (, so for , and ), .
Fourier Transform Calculations:
Suppose . Then is integrable on , so is well-defined for every .
Lecture 13
Note: If , then for all , since .
Example (the rectangle function):
Let (also written ). Then for , and .
Example:
Let and for , for . Then (the upper limit contributes 0 since ).
Example:
Let and . Splitting the integral at 0,
Theorem (Fourier inversion; proved in Lecture 15):
If , then at every where is continuous,
Lecture 14
Example:
Let . Differentiate under the integral sign (justified in Lecture 17, since ): Since , and then integrating by parts (the boundary terms vanish because ), This is the ODE , so But . (Polar coordinates: .) Hence So the Fourier transform of this Gaussian is the same Gaussian. Among the Gaussians , this is the only one whose Fourier transform is equal to the function itself (by the formula for below, this forces ).
Note:
Let . Given a function , how does the graph of compare with that of ? It’s a horizontal contraction () or stretch (), reflected if .
Theorem: (The Stretch Theorem)
Let and . Let . Then .
Proof:
Substitute , . If the limits stay and we get a factor . If the limits flip, and flipping them back gives a factor . Either way the factor is :
Note:
The more stretched out a function, the more squeezed its Fourier transform (and vice versa).
Example:
Let and . Find .
Solution:
Let . Recall that .
Express as for some . We want : Hence, , and
Theorem: (The Shift Theorem)
For any , define the shift operator . Then
Proof:
Let , :
Example:
Let . Find .
Solution:
Complete the square in the exponent: Let . Then By the previous example with , . By the Shift Theorem,
Lecture 15
Recall: if and , then .
If , then .
Example:
Let with . What is ?
Solution:
Write . Let . Then so first the Shift Theorem and then the Stretch Theorem give
Theorem: (Inversion)
Assume . Then at every where is continuous,
Proof (assuming also that is bounded, which covers every example in this course):
Insert a Gaussian damping factor . Since and as , (The difference is at most . Split it at : the tail is small by the Remark in Lecture 12, and on the factor .) Now write out : This double integral converges absolutely ( and ), so we may swap the order of integration: The inner integral is the Fourier transform of evaluated at , which by Lecture 14 is : Substitute , : As , by continuity of at . Moving the limit inside the integral is justified by the Theorem at the end of Lecture 19 (with , which has ). So the expression equals using with .
Note:
The inversion formula says , i.e. In particular, if is even, then .
Applications:
Let . What is ?
Recall that (the rectangle function). Therefore, , so since is even. So .
Caveat: (it decays only like ), so here must be understood as . In that sense the formula is correct, with value (the average) at the jumps .
The triangle function:
Let is even, so the sine part of integrates to 0. For , integrate by parts with , ; the boundary term vanishes at both ends: and . (This is the same computation as the triangle wave in Lecture 3. Lecture 18 gives a second derivation via .)
Note:
We can also compute integrals. For example, compute This is simply the integral of the Fourier transform of the triangle function. Since and is continuous, the inversion theorem at gives
Note:
Recall, if and then .
Example:
Find so that .
Solution:
The roots of are , i.e. and . Partial fractions: To match the form , multiply the top and bottom of each term by : (Check: , which agrees with .)
Example:
Find where .
Solution:
, and is exactly the factor produced by the Shift Theorem with : Hence
Example:
Let . Find .
Solution:
Recall that if , then . Then
Example:
Find .
(Partial fractions plus the inversion theorem; this is worked out at the start of Lecture 16. The answer is .)
Lecture 16
Example:
Let . What is ?
Solution:
. For , let , so that .
Consider . Therefore, .
Consider . With we have and , so Therefore (In general, the same computation gives for .)
Application:
We want to evaluate the integral (Check with arctangents: , the same.)
Derivation:
Let’s find the Fourier transforms of and in terms of the Fourier transform of , with . Consider : Thus, , and likewise . Hence The same for :
Example:
Compute .
Solution:
The integrand is an even function, so Using , , and (so ), We know so . Thus, the integral is equal to
Plancherel’s (Parseval’s) Identity
Let be continuous with . Then
Corollary:
Take . Then (Analog of Parseval’s (Rayleigh’s) Identity for Fourier series, Lecture 3.)
Proof:
Conjugating gives . So The double integral converges absolutely, since . So swap the order of integration: by the inversion theorem (Lecture 15).
Example:
Solution:
Let , so (both in ). The integral is , so by Plancherel it equals
Example:
Method 1:
Use the fact that is related to the transform of the triangle function: By inversion at 0 (Lecture 15),
Method 2:
Use Parseval, since is related to the rectangle function: (Strictly, , so this uses the extension of Plancherel to all with . Method 1 avoids the issue.)
Note:
We should study the link between the decay of and the differentiability of .
Lecture 17
(These notes had no entry for Lecture 17. The material below is a reconstruction of what Lecture 18 builds on: how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, and the resulting link between smoothness of and decay of . Check it against the lecture.)
Theorem (Transform of a derivative):
Suppose is continuous and piecewise , with . Then
Proof:
First, as . Indeed, , and since the integral has a limit as . So exists, and it must be 0, or else would not be integrable. The same holds as .
Now integrate by parts on (on each piece where is ; the interior boundary terms cancel because is continuous): Let . The boundary term tends to 0 since , which leaves .
This is the Fourier transform analog of from Lecture 7.
Corollary:
If and , then applying the theorem times, Combining with (Lecture 13), This is the Fourier transform version of Lecture 8: the more derivatives has, the faster decays.
Example:
The triangle function is continuous and piecewise , with By the Shift Theorem, and indeed, as the theorem predicts, This matches the decay picture: (discontinuous) has , while (continuous, with piecewise continuous derivative) has .
Theorem (Derivative of a transform):
Suppose and . Then is differentiable and
Proof:
Differentiate under the integral sign. This is legitimate because the -derivative of the integrand, , is bounded in absolute value by , which is integrable and does not depend on .
This justifies the first step of the Gaussian computation in Lecture 14. Iterating: if for all , then . So the two theorems are mirror images of each other:
Lecture 18
Fact (Lecture 17):
If with , then for .
Converse:
If for all , is ?
Answer:
No. Take the rectangle function (). We have However, . It’s not even continuous!
Let’s try the triangle function then, which is one order higher (): But ; in fact , because of its corners.
Theorem:
Let be continuous. If for some and all , then .
Proof:
Take first, so . In particular ( is bounded by near 0 and decays like at infinity), so by inversion Differentiating under the integral sign, This is legitimate because the -derivative of the integrand is bounded by , independent of , and (and is bounded near 0), so . The same domination shows that this integral is continuous in . Therefore, .
For general , repeat: for , so we may differentiate times, getting , continuous in .
(Compare Lecture 9. Applied to : , so , and that is all one can conclude.)
Definition:
The convolution of and , denoted by , is defined by (Substituting shows .)
Theorem: (Convolution Theorem)
If , then
Proof:
This double integral converges absolutely, since . So we may swap the order of integration: In the inner integral, substitute (this is the Shift Theorem): Hence
The same computation shows , with .
Example:
. Indeed, is the length of the overlap of and , which is for and 0 otherwise. So , recovering the computation from Lecture 15.
Example:
Evaluate
Solution:
Recall , so . For the second factor, use the Stretch Theorem with , which is 1 for and 0 for : The factor is a shift: by the Shift Theorem, has So, by the Convolution Theorem, the integrand is Both and its transform are in (the transform decays like ), and is continuous, so by the inversion theorem at we only need Now exactly for , and exactly for . These intervals overlap in , of length . Therefore (Sanity check: the imaginary part is the integral of an odd function, so the answer had to be real.)
Applications: ODE and PDE.
Example:
Solve on (looking for a solution with ).
Take the Fourier transform, using (Lecture 17): since (Lecture 13 with ). With , the Convolution Theorem gives , so The function , for which , is called the Green’s function of the ODE.
Lecture 19
Example (heat equation on the line):
Solve
Solution:
Fix and take the Fourier transform in . By Lecture 17, , so for each fixed , This is a first-order linear ODE in , so To invert, we want a function whose transform is . Recall that for , if , then . Taking , Thus, if , then , and Hence
Definition:
Note that for every .
Note:
The formula doesn’t make sense at ! So we should check that as .
For , Let , so and (the minus sign is absorbed by flipping the limits back to ): As , if is continuous at . So, for bounded and continuous, Moving the limit inside the integral is justified by the Theorem at the end of this lecture, since for .
Example:
Solve for , , with and bounded.
Take the Fourier transform in , to obtain For each fixed this is a constant-coefficient ODE in , with general solution The second term blows up as ; we discard it to keep the solution bounded, so . Then To invert, use Lecture 13 with : So for let Then , and since is even, inversion gives Thus , and :
Definition:
is called the Poisson kernel for the Laplace operator () in the upper half plane.
Note:
Once again we should check that the solution tends to as . This follows from the next theorem, since for , which has .
Theorem:
Let and . For , let . If is bounded and continuous, then for every
Proof:
Substituting , Since , we can write , so Let and fix . By the Remark in Lecture 12, choose with . Splitting the integral at , As the first term tends to 0 by continuity of at . So for every , which proves the claim.
Remark:
for every , while concentrates near 0 as (an “approximate identity”). Both kernels from this lecture are of this form: so the theorem shows as for the heat equation, and as for the Laplace equation.
Lecture 20
Applications:
Recall the Poisson kernel,
Let . since for . Also, . For ,
By the Theorem, as .
Applications:
Let . . For ,
Theorem:
Let . Assume that for and for are in . Then
Proof:
Since is times differentiable, the -th derivative of the convolution is times differentiable, therefore the convolution must be times differentiable.
Theorem: (Poisson Summation Formula)
Suppose , and . Then
In particular, when we get
Proof:
Define . is periodic of period 1.
Let . Then
Applications:
Let . We know that , where denotes the triangle function. In addition,
By the Poisson Summation Formula, we can obtain a quite beautiful result:
Example:
For , let . Recall that (finish this later, Poisson summation formula is used to get sum over the integers with and find formula for sum of )
Lecture 21
Example:
For , let . Then
We claim that LHS is easy to evaluate. We can compute the sum of easily as it is geometric. Then, we simply differentiate with respect to to get a formula:
Since this is real, then the RHS sum must have only real part as well in the summand.
So another interesting result is that the sum on the factor is equal to zero.
Fourier sine and cosine transforms:
Let be an function, so . Let be defined by
Then take the Fourier transforms:
Definition:
The Fourier cosine transform of is
and the Fourier sine transform of is
Inversion:
We know that the Fourier transform of an even function is even, and the Fourier transform of an odd function is odd. So
Thus, when ,
Likewise, the same holds for sine transform.
Example:
Let for . Compute .
By the inversion formula, for ,
Let
Theorem:
Suppose and . Then
Proof:
(please finish this)
Lecture 22
Application:
Solve the heat equation:
Take the sine transform of the PDE.
Let , then simplify:
By the inversion formula,
Can also try using the Cosine transform.
Then
The Laplace Transform
Definition:
Given , define the Laplace Transform of , denoted or by
Suppose . Then makes sense.
Properties:
Linearity:
Scaling: Let , then
Shifting:
Derivative: